Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Feminine Masculinity
I think it is interesting how Eliot talks about the gossipers who are involved in spreading the news about Bulstrode's past. She includes some very interesting references to both the male and female characters as she introduces some new characters with very distinct attributes. For instance, Mr. Limp is the "meditative shoemaker with weak eyes and a piping voice (678). Mr. Hopkins, the "meek-mannered draper," needed to talk to men because he usually only dealt with women (672). And then there are the "horse men." Mr. Bambridge talks about horse business with Mr. Hawley. These men are clearly manly men. Why does Eliot make the distinction between the types of people who begin to talk about Bulstrode? Do they all have flaws (all except Will Ladislaw, of course)? These few pages seem full of descriptive passages about their personalities. Is Eliot trying to get the point across that all people have flaws, or is there something else run afoul in Middlemarch?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
From what you're saying here, it seems like Eliot may be satirizing the old addage, "talk is cheap". I feel that if we've learned anything in this book, it is that talk (public opinion) and material well being have everything to do with one another. I just had a thought-- does anyone else think that the gambling scenes and the horse scenes have anything to do with one another?
ReplyDeleteThat comment really didn't address your post very well at all. I'm sorry, Ann! I agree that is seems like Eliot is feminizing these men for doing a "feminine" activity (gossip). I think it's to emphasize the slippery social space into which business and gossip fit-- i.e, each practice is essential to the other, and both sexes do them, but some individuals within the system are more privileged than others.
ReplyDeleteAlso-- Mr. Limp and Mr. "Hop"kins? LOL!
ReplyDeleteLOLOL!
ReplyDelete